Answer:
A. We have extremely strong evidence to reject H0.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let P be the proportion of non-retirees in 2015 who did not think that Social Security would be able to pay a retirement benefit by the time that they retire.
According to the data null and alternative hypotheses should be:
: P=0.60
: P<0.60
Test statistics is -4.29 and p-value of the statistics is p<0.001
At every significance levels higher than 0.001, we can reject the null hypothesis since p<0.001.
Answer:
No, because the ratio of pay to hours is not the same for each pair of value.
Answer: (f·g)(x) = -5x³ - 31x² + 62x + 18
(f·g)(-1) = -70
(fog)(x) = 25x² - 130x + 155
(fog)(-1) = 310
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
f(x) = x² + 8x + 2 g(x) = -5x + 9
(f·g)(x) = (x² + 8x + 2)(-5x + 9)
= -5x³ + 9x²
- 40x² + 72x
<u> - 10x + 18</u>
= -5x³ - 31x² + 62x + 18
(f·g)(-1)= -5(-1)³ - 31(-1)² + 62(-1) + 18
= -5(-1) - 31(1) - 62 + 18
= 5 - 31 - 62 + 18
= -70
****************************************************************************************
(fog)(x) = (-5x + 9)² + 8(-5x + 9) + 2
= 25x² - 90x + 81
- 40x + 72
<u> + 2</u>
= 25x² - 130x + 155
(fog)(-1) = 25(-1)² - 130(-1) + 155
= 25 + 130 + 155
= 310
<em>It wasn't clear if you wanted multiplication or composition so I solved both.</em>
The etimated answer would be 20. The method that I used is I rounded 3.9 to 4 and 4.6 to 5 and then I mutiplied. Hope I helped
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Changing Bases to Evaluate Logarithms

Apply change of base formula'

log term should be the numerator and denominator is the log base


64 is 4^3 and 16 is 4^2

Move the exponent before log

top and bottom has same log so cancel it out
