Answer:
It is a questioning word, similar to the word asks.
Explanation:
The majority of chemist would not find the claim that this form of helium did not release the same number of neutrons as other helium credible because :
The chemists claim is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence ( B )
The claim made by the chemists is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence because nuclear fusion is the reaction between two light nuclei to form heavy atomic nucleus ( one or more ) . during the reaction between the nuclei the release or absorption of heat reflects the differences in the masses of the reactants and product. It is not dependent on the amount of neutrons released.
Hence we can conclude that the claim is not credible because the Chemist claim is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence.
Learn more : brainly.com/question/18545784
I assume the answer is man-made, correct?
The aanswer to the top question is D. Animals would lose their homes and soil would wash away. The answer to the bottom question is B coal because that takes millions of years to form
