Answer: Melanie is the correct answer (hopefully)
Step-by-step explanation:
7 is a better decision because its higher than 6 which gets a better chance of winning (sorry for being bad at explaining)
Is known that
(a + b)² = a² + 2.a.b + b²
So:
(x + 4)² = x² + 2.x.4 + 4² = x² + 8x + 16
Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
Answer: y = 2/5 x + 2
Step-by-step explanation:
why not do this one too yk
slope = y2 - y1 / x2 - x1
4 - 2 / 5 - 0
slope = 2/5
ill use (5,4) for the y=mx+b initial equation
y = mx+b
4 = (2/5)(5) +b
4 = 2 + b
2 = b
now for the final equation whoop whoop
y = 2/5 x + 2
Answer:
(-4,1)
Step-by-step explanation:
for x you do:
1 - 5 = -4
for y you do:
4 - 3 = 1
so it is (-4,1)