The inequality:
48 < 6 n
6 n > 48
n > 48 : 6
n > 8
Answer: n = { 9, 10, 11 } ( 3 values )
We can prove this: 48 < 6*9 or 48 < 54, 48 < 60, 48 < 66
Answer: D
Step-by-step explanation:
A counterexample is an isosceles trapezoid.
15 cups, I am pretty sure, i might be under thinking it
The issue with using the side-splitter to solve for x is that the side-splitter theorem is used to find lengths of the sides being split by parallel lines. In this case, the x is on a line that is parallel and thus could not be solved for using this theorem.
If we created a triangle where the tops of the non-parallel lines connected, we would be able to compare the following and solve:

However, none of this would help us solve for x using this theorem.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
standard form is ax + by = c, which is true for the third option.