Answer: Purpose of the sugar law
Explanation: The goal of this law was threefold. First, the British realized that smuggling was almost endemic and that the rule of law was being undermined by illegal trade. Secondly, to protect British Commerce by introducing new trade restrictions after established navigation acts. Three, the war of the French Indians had taken a toll on British finance and the Americans had to pay for their own protection. With these goals on mind, the sugar law was designed to bring down colonial trade with countries other than Britain, especially France and Spain with colonies in the west Indies while increasing revenue to pay British debt.
Answer:
co-parenting
Explanation: This way the parent can show the child what a stable relationship between two people who aren't together can look like.
I believe the answer is: <span>The full faith and credit clause of the U.S. Constitution requires state executives to honor and enforce the laws and decisions of other states
The main purpose of the executive branch is to ensure that the regulations that passed by the legislative branch is being enacted. Because of this, executive branches control almost all the government organization that get in touch with the citizens (such as administration, police department, etc)</span><span /><span>
</span>
Answer:
D) Tammy can hold and use a pencil more easily than she could last year.
Explanation:
Physical development consists in the evolution of the human body, which develops motor and coordination skills as the stages of childhood evolve. This is very noticeable in children, for example, when a baby begins to walk, he or she initially becomes unbalanced. However, over time, the child develops balance and begins to walk normally thanks to his/her physical and intellectual development that gives him/her motor conditions. The same can be true of Tammy, who finds she can hold a pencil more easily than in the past. After physical evolution, she had improved coordination ability to hold the pencil more firmly.
Answer:
No, Adam is not correct. Constitutional protections do not extend to privately-owned apartment complexes.
Explanation
