Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
Pull factors are something that makes you want to go to somewhere else, unlike push factors, which push you away from somewhere because something happened.
Answer:
e. all of the above
Explanation:
This is true because, not only did the southerners began questioning the morality of slavery and its associated trading, they also vented their angers towards the northern abolitionists. The Northerners on the other-hand, wondered why the southerners were surprised with the idea that the slaves in question would rebel from their masters.
An important scientist at the time, besides, those who were mentioned was Copernicus - A.
Spartacus was just a slave general in the Roman republic.
Rousseau was a philosopher.
Plato was a philosopher as well.
The correct answer for that reason is Copernicus, he was an astronomer and a major figure at the time.
Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
Answer:
The main way in which the Iroquois Confederacy was like the US government was that both were made up of representatives from groups that originally considered themselves to be separate nations. The Iroquois Confederacy was made up of the Five Nations while the US government was made up of (originally) the 13 states.
Hope this helps you