1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oduvanchick [21]
3 years ago
9

“Just yesterday, you sent me a telegram appealing to my friendship and called upon me to act as an intermediary and help resolve

the conflict between you and the Austro-Hungarian government. But I understand that, even as you did that, your troops were being mobilized against Austria-Hungary. This makes my attempts at meditation almost pointless. Nonetheless, I continued in my efforts today.
I now receive fresh news of even more serious Russian preparations for war on my Eastern frontier. Responsibility for the safety of my empire forces me to take defensive and preventive measures. In my endeavors to maintain the peace of the world, I have gone to the utmost limit possible. The responsibility for the disaster that is now threatening the civilized world will not be laid at my door. At this moment, you still have the power to avert war. Nobody is threatening the honor or power of Russia, and you can well afford to await the result of my mediation. My friendship for you and your empire, transmitted to me by my grandfather on his deathbed, has always been sacred to me and I have often supported Russia in the past when she was in serious trouble.”

Wilhelm II, emperor of Germany, telegram to Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, July 31, 1914

Which of the following events that preceded the outbreak of the First World War best explains why Russian troops were being mobilized against Austria-Hungary, as stated in the first paragraph?
History
1 answer:
GuDViN [60]3 years ago
8 0

Answer with Explanation:

<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>

The event which preceded the outbreak of the First World War was the assassination of "Franz Ferdinand," the person who was supposed to inherit the<em> Austria-Hungary throne.</em> He was a close friend of Kaiser Wilhelm, the last German emperor. His assassination occurred while he was having a city tour in Saravejo.

Such<em> insolent crime</em> made Austria-Hungary enforce its authority by preparing for a war. Emperor Franz Josef then asked for help from Kaiser Wilhem by writing a letter. It was successful in having Germany's full support.

Then, Austria-Hungary demanded Serbia to<u> wipe-out terrorists within its border</u> due to the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. This was actually an <em>ultimatum</em> and that if they didn't act fast, they will have to face a<em> military action.</em><em> </em>

Serbia then asked help from the Russian government. The Russian troops were started to be mobilized against Austria-Hungary.

You might be interested in
How did colonial leaders such as Samuel Adams and Paul Revere react to the Boston killings?
Kitty [74]

-Jacob V. Samuel Adams convinced Paul Revere to make a picture of the Boston Massacre. It wasn't accurate, but Samuel Adams wanted to use what happened in the Boston Massacre to make Colonists even angrier...

Hope it helps! ツ

5 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELPPP!!!!
leonid [27]
It is A ( separation of powers)
hope this helped out!
3 0
3 years ago
Question: How did a dynasty lose or gain the Mandate of Heaven?
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

B> - If the ruling dynasty was fair, it would keep the Mandate of Heaven.

Explanation:

The Mandate of Heaven was a belief in the establishment of a ruler from the qualities of a person. Under this Mandate, there is no specific rule that determines who can or cannot become the ruler. Rather, a person's qualities, such as being fair, just, how well he can rule, or how 'good' he is in terms of his behavior and qualities.

The belief that such a ruler is determined from the internal qualities comes from the idea of the ruler being the "son of heaven". In other words, such type of person is good, just, kind, fair, and does not indulge in immoral or bad activities, which makes him ideal for a leader. Moreover, he will also be accepted by the gods, which is a huge factor.

So, <u>if a ruling dynasty or a ruler is fair, he can keep the Mandate of Heaven</u> but if not, then the Mandate cannot be his.

Thus, the correct answer is option B.

4 0
3 years ago
Explain how rationalism/empiricism can be one of the main schools of thought.
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

i hope this helps boom

Explanation:

The dispute between rationalism and empiricism concerns the extent to which we are dependent upon sense experience in our effort to gain knowledge. Rationalists claim that there are significant ways in which our concepts and knowledge are gained independently of sense experience. Empiricists claim that sense experience is the ultimate source of all our concepts and knowledge.

Rationalists generally develop their view in two ways. First, they argue that there are cases where the content of our concepts or knowledge outstrips the information that sense experience can provide. Second, they construct accounts of how reason in some form or other provides that additional information about the world. Empiricists present complementary lines of thought. First, they develop accounts of how experience provides the information that rationalists cite, insofar as we have it in the first place. (Empiricists will at times opt for skepticism as an alternative to rationalism: if experience cannot provide the concepts or knowledge the rationalists cite, then we don’t have them.) Second, empiricists attack the rationalists’ accounts of how reason is a source of concepts or knowledge.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The person who controlled 90% of all oil refined in the U.S. was?
BartSMP [9]

The person is controlled 90% of all oil refined in the U.S. was Rockefeller.

What is oil refined?

The term "oil refined" refers to the industry method of filtering oil. Petroleum products are separated from crude oil. The undesirable materials were eliminated during the procedure, along with the oil filter.

Rockefeller is very famous in the United States because it controlled 90% of all oil refined. Rockefeller was the sign of the monopoly market. Around 1980, the oil refined was in supply to another company.

As a result, Rockefeller is the only one to control 90% of all oil refined.

Learn more about oil refined, here:

brainly.com/question/11571045

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • How did the allies react to the russian revolution?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did Stalin want to create a buffer zone
    14·1 answer
  • Later in history, one of the major Greek cities fought off the Persians at the tiny seaport town of Marathon. Most likely, which
    7·1 answer
  • Did cars live up to thier promises to improve the quality of life? if so how? thank you:)
    14·1 answer
  • This document is used to list injuries ad illnesses, track days away from work, restricted work, or transferred employees, and i
    8·1 answer
  • What is a characteristic of the rights of French citizens under the Napoleonic Code?
    8·1 answer
  • What was America’s most effective weapon in the Cold War
    8·2 answers
  • 1-true or false:only the Dutch were welcomed in new Amsterdam.if false,explain why it’s false.
    5·1 answer
  • Do you agree with the concept of a presidential pardon? what were pardons originally intended to do?
    8·1 answer
  • Need help with this question
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!