Answer: WHAT WAS THE SAME 1) reigning dynasty was Bourbon dynasty, 2) there was no democracy and democratic participation on political order (no elections), 3) society continued being not secularized (unity of trone and altar), 4) no free press (freedom of expression). "Declaration de l´homme et du citoyen" (preamble of all French constitutions) was not put in reality. WHAT WAS DIFFERENT: 1) power of dynasty was increasingly dependent on foreign countries, dynasty had weak support from the population, dynasty was put back on the basis of Vienna Congress (1814-1815), 2) French kings had to make concessions (limited monarchy), 3) there were three currents on the right-wing political spectre: - legistimistes (supporting absolute monarchy and Bourbon dynasty), - orleanistes (supporting constitutional monarchy of the house of Orleans), - napoleonistes (supporting house of Napoleon), - there was much less credibility of Bourbon dynasty.
Explanation:
The Unified Command allows different jurisdictions to manage and direct activities with a single action plan together.
In the Incident Command System, it is authority, in which two or more individuals share the role of commanders of actions, each already have authority in a different agency to which it is responsible. This type of command is used when the simultaneous operation of multiple agencies and jurisdictions is required. A unique command allows agencies with different legal, geographic and functional areas to act effectively without affecting the authority of individual agencies.
Under a Unified Command, all activities are focused on a coordinated plan for an incident, and that plan governs all activities.
Unlike liberal critics of Roosevelt’s New Deal, conservative critics generally felt that the New Deal required far too much money, and was hurting the tax payers, who were funding the massive government projects that were intended to get the economy back on track.
