The graph that represents the inequality has been shown in the attachment.
<h3>How to solve for the graph</h3>
We have these equations 
 y ≤ −3x + 1 
y ≤ x + 3
We remove the inequality sign from both of these equations
y = −3x + 1 
y = x + 3
−3x + 1  = x + 3
such that 
x = -0.5
we use this value for x in any of the equations
 x + 3 = -0.5 + 3
= 2.5
the point of intersection is at 2.5, -0.5
we test for the origin. 0,0
3x + 1 
= 3*0 + 1
= 1
for  x + 3 
0+3 = 3
This is 0≤1 and 0≤3
Hence the graph should be shaded to the origin.
Read more on a graph here: brainly.com/question/14030149
#SPJ1
 
        
             
        
        
        
To get -4 from 1, we must either subtract 5 from 1 or mult. 1 by -4.  Unfortunately subtracting 5 from -4 does not result in 9, and mult -4 by -4 does not result in -16.  So neither "works"  in predicting the next term.
Can you think of any other experiments to do that would help you discover the pattern 1, -4, 9, -16?  
        
                    
             
        
        
        
surface area = (2)(5)(13)+(13)(10)+(12)(10)
 
        
             
        
        
        
91,235/3 = 30,411.6 repeating
No, it is not divisible.