Let x represent the larger number.
Let y represent the smaller number.
x-y=4 Given
3x=5y-2 Given
Now we can just substitute; let x=4+y
Substitute 4+y for x in the second equation:
3(4+y)=5y-2
12+3y=5y-2
-2y=-14
y=7
Substitute back (into BOTH equations to double check work).
x, the larger number, is 11
Ok so remember that if you had
1/2 times 3/4 that equals (1 ties 3)/(2 times 4)
just mutply top number with top number and bottom number with bottom number so
remember that 20=20/1 so
5/6 times 20/1=
5 times 20=100
6 times 1=6
5/6 times 20/1=100/6 (can be simplified to 50/3 or 16 and 2/3)
Answer:
B
Root of 27 will be 9×3. Which will be 3 root 3
Answer:
Transitive property of equality is not a justification for the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
We draw a right angle ΔACB. CD is perpendicular to AB.
Let AC = a , BC = b , AB = c and CD = h
Now in ΔABC and ΔACD
∠C = ∠D and ∠A = ∠A
from AA similarity postulate
ΔABC similar to ΔACD.
Hence,
= 
= c × x ·····················(1)
Now in ΔABC and ΔCBD
∠C = ∠D and ∠B = ∠B
from AA similarity postulates
ΔABC similar to ΔCBD
Hence,

= c × y······················(2)
Add equation (1) and (2)
+
= cx + cy
+
= c(x+y)
+
=
[because x+y=c]
Transitive property is not useful for this proof.