1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
3 years ago
6

Imagine that you are living in a country that has a command economy.

Law
2 answers:
Rama09 [41]3 years ago
7 0
It’s the first one how a command economy is run
umka21 [38]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

the answer How a command economy is run

Explanation:

The amount of government control

The amount of freedom you have

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!! Im not sure if its A. Please tell the right answer and no fake answers please! Thanks!
wel

Answer:

D

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do you understand the due process as a right.​
Serhud [2]
Why do work have to be so hard bro
3 0
2 years ago
An employee filed in state court a civil action alleging sexual harassment in the workplace. She asserted federal statutory empl
kiruha [24]
Yes, they may remove the case to federal district court.
7 0
3 years ago
As you approach any intersection, you should be prepared to avoid colliding with
Wewaii [24]

Answer:

Pedestrians and Bicyclists coming from any direction.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment.  Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the first document that colleges review when making admissions
    8·1 answer
  • Please read the following scenario and then respond to the question. Adriana fell in the grocery store and broke her arm. She cl
    6·1 answer
  • How old is obama <br><br> This is worth a lot of pints
    10·1 answer
  • Why is it good to be calm when interrogated by police?
    15·1 answer
  • What is special crime investigation​
    8·2 answers
  • President Obama was a member of the Democratic Party and is a-
    14·1 answer
  • Why am I getting this in my email there is nobody in my home that needs this. Cancel all emails immediately
    5·2 answers
  • When is a right or duty not transferable in a contract?
    7·2 answers
  • Please help due today
    5·1 answer
  • While driving, you see this pavement marking painted on the road ahead, in your lane. This
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!