People we support should not be included in learning and taking part in the emergency preparedness plan- false.
people we support should be included in learning and taking part in emergency preparedness plan because the best way to prepare for disaster is to be with family and friends.
Being ready can lessen the stress, loss, and fear that come with disasters. Families, communities, and people all need to be aware of what to do in the event of a fire and where to go for safety during a severe storm. They ought to be prepared to leave their houses, seek safety in public shelters, and take care of their most basic medical requirements.
to learn more about emergency preparedness here
brainly.com/question/17750026
#SPJ4
Healthy ecosystems clean our water, purify our air, maintain our soil, regulate the climate, recycle nutrients and provide us with food. They provide raw materials and resources for medicines and other purposes
Answer:
<h2>A. RIKKI -TIKKI-TAVI</h2>
Explanation:
<h3>✌✌✌✌✌✌✌✌✌✌✌</h3>
It is a matter of opinion, I suppose.
We need jurors, of course, but with so many people who hate it, there surely wouldn't be enough if the goverment simply allowed whoever wanted to volunteer to be the jury. I suppose that makes it sound like a burden, as it's a goverment-ordered requirement, like taxes. It is a privilege, though, if you think about it. Being selected for jury-duty means that you're a reliable citizen of America and you're trusted enough to help make a very important decision.
So, to restate my initial response, Jury duty can be seen as a duty or a burden, depending on how one views it.
