All categories

3 years ago

3. comparing salaries from different times

Business

2 answers:

lidiya [134]3 years ago

5 0

Answer: Falsei

Explanation:

Inflation rate (Bryon Nelson)

1945 price × (current yearcpi / base year cpi)

= Current year price

1. (Bryon Nelson) 1945

$63,336 × ( 172.2/18) = $605914.4

In 2000 would be worth $605914.4.

2. 1973 jack nicklaus

$308,362 × ( 172.2/44.4) =$1195944.514.

In 2000 would be worth $1195944.514

3. 1991 corey pavin

979,430 × (172.2/136.2) = $1238310.176

In 2000 would be worth $1238310.176.

The golfer with the highest PGA winning in norminal dollar after inflation is same after adjusting the inflation tiger woods still comes top

vfiekz [6]3 years ago

3 0

The correct answer for this question is this one: TRUE.

true or false: according to the previous table, the golfer with the highest pga winnings in nominal dollars is not the same as the golfer with the highest pga winnings after adjusting for inflation.

true 
false
Hope this helps answer your question and have a nice day ahead.

You might be interested in

A Canadian company is examining the relative wages, land-acquisition costs, and access to R&D facilities before deciding to

leonid [27]

Answer:

The correct answer is ''Market Analysis''.

Explanation:

A market analysis is the name given, in the field of economics, to the term that refers to the strategy used by many managers to know whether is good or bad to enter a new market. It is part of an industry analysis and it shows the attractiveness and dynamics within the market that could led to a very good decision at the time of decising whether to operate or not in a foreign market. Moreover, it is also known as a documented investigation whose main focus is on evaluating the basics of a new market and inform to the managers of the company that information. Therefore that a ''market analysis'' is particulary important to the company's choice of a mode of entry.

3 0

3 years ago

Billy Dan and Betty Lou were recently married and want to start saving for their dream home. They expect the house they want wil

zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

Billy Dan and Betty Lou have to invest $11,551 each year to purchase their dream home at the end of 12 years

Explanation:

The requirement of this is missing, that is provided below

How much will Billy Dan and Betty Lou have to invest each year to purchase their dream home at the end of 12 years? Assume an interest rate of 10 percent.

Use the following formula to calculate the amount of yearly investment.

Cost to purchase the house = Annual investment x ( 1 + Interest rate )^numbers of years ) - 1 ) / interest rate

Where

Cost to purchase the house = $247,000

Interest rate = 10%

Numbers of years = 12 years

Annual investment = ?

Placing values in the formula

$247,000 = Annual investment x ( 1 + 10% )^12 ) - 1 ) / 10%

$247,000 = Annual investment x 21.384284

Annual investment = $247,000 / 21.384284

Annual investment = $11,550.54

Annual investment = $11,551

Hence, they have to invest $11,551 each year to be able to purchase the house for cash in 12 years.

3 0

3 years ago

11) A company knows that they will sell 80,000 cases of #2 Pencils at a steady rate over the course of the next year. It costs t

romanna [79]

Answer:

139 units

Explanation:

In order to compute the number of orders place each year so that it can minimize the total inventory cost we need to use the economic order quantity formula i.e shown below:

The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:

$= \sqrt{\frac{2\times \text{Annual demand}\times \text{Ordering cost}}{\text{Carrying cost}}}$

where,

Annual demand = 80,000 cases

Ordering cost = $12

And, the carrying cost = $100

Now placing these values to the above formula

So, the economic order quantity is

$= \sqrt{\frac{2\times \text{80,000}\times \text{\$12}}{\text{\$100}}}$

= 139 units

4 0

4 years ago

Would you say that systems that have higher efficiency ratios than other systems will always have higher utilization ratios than

SashulF [63]

Complete Question:

Determine the utilization and the efficiency for each of these situations:

a. A loan processing operation that processes an average of 7 loans per day. The operation has a design capacity of 10 loans per

day and an effective capacity of 8 loans per day.

b. A furnace repair team that services an average of four furnaces a day if the design capacity is six furnaces a day and the

effective capacity is five furnaces a day.

c. Would you say that systems that have higher efficiency ratios than other systems will always have higher utilization ratios than

those other systems? Explain.

Explanation:

It's not (true) actually. Whether the design capacity is comparatively (high), the utilisation could be (low) even though the efficiency was (high).

Utilisation = Output / Design capacity = $\frac{17}{10}$ x 100%

Efficiency = Output / Effective capacity = $\frac{7}{8}$

Utilisation = $\frac{4}{6}$

Efficiency = $\frac{4}{5}$

U = 1000/2000

e = 1000/1000

4 0

3 years ago

A consumer is consuming at a point on her budget line. Her income is $50 a week, and she purchases hamburgers and grilled cheese

Ivahew [28]

Answer:

Each grilled cheese costs $1.25

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Her income is $50 a week. Hamburgers cost $4, and she consumes 10 of them. She consumes eight grilled cheese sandwiches.

To calculate the price of the grilled cheese sandwiches, we need to use the following equation:

Income= cost of hamburgers*number of units + cost of grilled cheese*number of units

50= 4*10 + x*8

10=8x

$1.25= x= grilled cheese

3 0

3 years ago