Answer:
a. 19.750 b. 138.250
Explanation:
A. We divide 158.000 by 8 to get the amount per year
158.000/8= 19.750
- Amortization expense (Db) 19.750
- Accumulated amortization (Cr) 19.750
B. On the balance sheet at the end of the first year, we would subtract those 19.750 to the gross value of the patent and the value of the patent would be
158.000 - 19.750 = 138.250
<u><em>Net carrying amount of the patent:</em></u><em> 138.250</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
United States is producing 200 tons of hamburgers and 60 tons of tacos.
United States' opportunity cost for producing 1 ton of hamburgers
= 
= 0.3
United States' opportunity cost for producing 60 tons of tacos.
= 
= 3.33
So we see that US has a lower opportunity cost in producing hamburgers, so it has a comparative advantage in producing hamburgers.
Mexico is producing 40 tons of hamburgers and 50 tons of tacos.
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of hamburgers
= 
= 1.25
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of tacos
= 
= 0.8
So we see that Mexico has a lower opportunity cost in producing tacos, so it has a comparative advantage in making tacos.
Since US specializes in making hamburgers, it will produce 200 tons of hamburgers and 0 tons of tacos.
Mexico specializes in making tacos, it will produce 50 tons of tacos and 0 tons of hamburgers.
Answer:
E. Debit Retained Earnings $7,400; credit Common Dividends Payable $7,400.
Explanation:
The Journal entry is shown below:-
Retained earnings Dr, $7,400 (14,800 × $0.50)
To Common dividend Payable $7,400
(Being dividend declaration is recorded)
Here to record the dividend declaration we simply debited the retained earnings as it decreased the stockholder equity and credited the common dividends payable as it increased the liability
So the correct option is D.
Answer:
Jones is right in this lawsuit
Explanation:
Arbitration is the process by which disputes are settled between parties. When there is a disagreement between parties an arbitrator comes in to give a fair and unbiased view of the situation.
A solution that is agreed to by all parties is agreed upon to settle.
In this scenario where Jones is filing a lawsuit against BigMoney LLC for violating the Securities Exchange Act by engaging in fraudulent excessive trading, this is a violation of the law and not a dispute between parties.
So the arbitration clause is is not binding and the arbitration clause should be nullified.
