Susan’s statement is the true one
Answer:
The answer would be C.
Explanation:
A. wouldn't do anything for Mexico, it would just make more Mexican citizens flea from Mexico.
B. wouldn't work at all because a wall has been proven not to stop anyone.
D. wouldn't work either. Mexico enforcing or not enforcing anti-drug laws has been proven not to change anything. In fact, to compare this so that it makes more sense, guns are completely illegal in Mexico, and Mexican Citizens and Cartels still have so many firearms that are usually illegal in the United States. So what would happen if they even tried to change anything about enforcing fewer or more anti-drug laws?
<u>Main point is that education opportunities in Mexico would make a huge change, especially if it was more politic related because then it would cause another type of revolution to occur, resulting in people wanting to fight for a good cause and a better future for Mexico.</u>
The answer is stated below along with an explanation:
Yes. I believe that both the incomplete dominant and co-dominant patterns of inheritance is found in the human traits. In psychology classes, those topics are tackled and discussed. For example let's say incomplete dominant inheritance, when the father has a straight hair and the mother has a curly hair, then the child will have a wavy hair. For co-dominant inheritance example, half the cell of a person may include both sickle cell and normal cell.
I think for the first one its sea level changes
Answer:
The "spoils system" allocated political appointments on the basis of party loyalty.
Explanation:
The spoil system is also known as the patronage system. This is the system in which the political party after winning the election gives the important positions to the people who have extended their support to the party. The party provides a reward to the supporters in return for their efforts and supports. This system stands in opposition to the merit system.
