Answer:
A historian
Explanation:
I took the quiz and got 100
Answer:
a
Explanation:
I did this today and I got it right
Globalization in essence is companies and governments climbing onto the world stage and interacting internationally.
Globalization has helped some, but it has also hurt a lot, specifically through:
- Making the rich richer
- Removing trade barriers only for new ones to rise (VAT taxes, etc.)
- Increased trade deficits with many jobs leaving their developed nations for less developed ones (U.S. manufacturing to China, etc.)
- Developed country job pay cuts
- MNC's leaving countries and exploiting international tax havens
- MNC's overseeing bad work conditions in countries with less regulations
- MNC's influencing international politics
- Exploitation of labor
- Social welfare schemes
Et cetera, et cetera...
All the problems we hear about with companies leaving their countries and stranding thousands if not millions of people without jobs, and labor issues in other countries all stem from globalization. So we need to decide if the benefits outweigh the costs here or not...
Answer: A referendum
Explanation:
A referendum is one of the process in which the voters are given a chance to give accept or reject the specific proposal by the legislative and it is also known as the universal type of vote.
The main purpose of a referendum is that it basically allow the citizens of the country to either approve or disapprove the given legislative law or various type of new policies which is typically proposed by the constitution.
According to the given question, the given example is best illustrating the concept of a referendum as it helps in determine the main effect of the law that the residents are not allow to parking their cars during the time of night hours on the streets.
Therefore, Referendum is the correct answer.
According to Merton's typology of prejudice and discrimination, Xavier is an unprejudiced nondiscriminator, whereas Reuben is a prejudiced nondiscriminator.
<h3>Unprejudiced vs. Prejudiced</h3>
Xavier and Reuben cannot be accused of discrimination of African Americans since they both accept them in their chess club. However, there is a big difference between Xavier and Reuben, even if their behavior is the same.
Xavier truly believes African Americans are as intelligent as white Americans, which means he is unprejudiced. Reuben, on the other hand, does not hold the same belief. He is prejudiced against African Americans, thinking they have weak cognitive abilities.
Therefore, even though both can be considered nondiscriminators, Xavier is unprejudiced, whereas Reuben is prejudiced.
Learn more about nondiscriminators here:
brainly.com/question/13782165
#SPJ12
