As far as I could find, the following were a feature of the reformin 1996:
increased work requirements (especially after two years)
a five-year limit on benefits from federal funds
So these were definitely a feature.
Of the remaining two, it is true that the cash assistance was diminished in 1996.
So i think that the transportation vouchers were not provided. Additionally, I found that transportation costs can be deducted from taxes by the employers, and that there is a number of smaller programs providing transportation benefits, but I don't think that they were a major part of the reform (so the last option).
Answer:
maaf kalo salah red river
Answer:
the are in order backwards
Explanation:
<span>Increasing the use of nuclear power and planting trees in urban areas are two methods of reducing atmospheric levels of : Carbon dioxide
If it used correctly, the energy that produced with nuclear power does not produce harmful emission for the environment such as CO2.
As for trees, they absorb CO2 for their photosynthetic process, which will reduce CO2 amount in atmosphere
</span>
Yes because you cannot establish credibility without a source that is experienced on the research topic. it would be like a janitor writing journals about brain surgery when he never went to school to get his doctorate degree and has no valid knowledge of the topic.
