How do ethical concerns affect scientific research?

SAT

2 answers:

vampirchik [111]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Ethics prevents science from going beyond the limits of what is right and provides for the growth of the human being.

Explanation:

The science that characterizes modern societies can and should be analyzed from its various angles. From a more classical approach to epistemology to a more recent look at cultural studies, studies on scientific activity multiply.

Not long ago scientific experiments were done without any moral criteria and without even being questioned. The consequence of this is that much scientific research has brought about various problems from both the individual and social point of view. Some classic cases involve, for example, research with cloning, stem cells, the possibility of genetic manipulation of life and even lasting preservation of life under artificial conditions, or even intervention in fetuses (abortion), evidence the expansion of our scientific power. -technological. Power that inscribes us, immediately, in this ethical horizon, where it allows us to ask ourselves what we can do and what we should do.

Based on this, ethics has shaped scientific research, ensuring that advances respect a fine line between new discoveries and the physical, moral and ethical well-being and preservation of individuals who will be directly affected by research.

VARVARA [1.3K]3 years ago

5 0

Hello

We can approach science from various angles. It may be that our aim is to solve a problem or to try to understand something. But, at the same time, what we find in it as explanatory or credible may be different if our profession is to be a trader, an importer of industrial equipment, a researcher or a teacher. Our concerns about science may differ according to the angle from which we think about it. That is to say, what is important when judging or evaluating science is different according to our relationship with it at certain times: whether we see it as producers, disseminators or consumers. Therefore, from the outset we have an area of complexity in thinking about science from our starting point.

You might be interested in

Indicate how the rational choice decision-making perspective emphasises the rewards and risks of theft.

My name is Ann [436]

Answer: Rational choice theory is based on the fundamental tenets of classical criminology, which hold that people freely choose their behaviour and are motivated by the avoidance of pain and the pursuit of pleasure. Individuals evaluate their choice of actions in accordance with each option's ability to produce advantage, pleasure and happiness. Rational choice provides a micro perspective on why individual offenders decide to commit specific crimes; people choose to engage in crime because it can be rewarding, easy, satisfying and fun. The central premise of this theory is that people are rational beings whose behaviour can be controlled or modified by a fear of punishment. In this way, it is believed offenders can be persuaded to desist from offending by intensifying their fear of punishment. In terms of setting the quantum of punishment, according to this theory, sanctions should be limited to what is necessary to deter people from choosing crime (Siegel and McCormick, 2006).

Rational choice is premised on a utilitarian belief that actions are based on a conscious evaluation of the utility of acting in a certain way. This perspective assumes that crime is a personal choice, the result of individual decision-making processes. This means that individuals are responsible for their choices and thus individual offenders are subject to blame for their criminality. In terms of offending, rational choice posits that offenders weigh the potential benefits and consequences associated with committing an offence and then make a rational choice on the basis of this evaluation. Therefore, before committing a crime, the reasoning criminal weighs the chances of getting caught, the severity of the expected penalty and the value to be gained by committing the act. This means that if offenders perceive the costs to be too high, the act to be too risky, or the payoff to be too small, they will choose to not engage in the act.

The tenets of this theory are based on a number of assumptions about the decision-making process and behavioural motivations. It is held that people decide to commit crime after careful consideration of the costs and benefits of behaving in a certain manner. This involves considering both personal factors, which may include a need for money, revenge, or entertainment, and situational factors such as the target/victim’s vulnerability and the presence of witnesses, guardians, or the police. Rational choice focuses on the opportunity to commit crime and on how criminal choices are structured by the social environment and situational variables.

3 0

3 years ago

Prove that the segment,joining the points of contact of two parallel tangents passes through the centre.

wariber [46]

Given: Two parallel tangents PQ and RS touch a circle C (O,r) at A and B respectively.
To prove: AB will pass through the centre O of the circle.
Construction:Draw a line OC parallel to RS.

Proof: PA || CO

=> ∠PAO + ∠COA =180 [Sum of the angles on the same side of a transversal is 180]
=> 90 + ∠COA = 180 [ ∠PAO = Angle between a tangent and radius = 90]
=> ∠COA = 90

Similarly, ∠COB = 90
Therefore, ∠COA + ∠COB = 90 + 90 = 180

Hence, AOB is a straight line passing through O.