Answer:
to accomplish a specific goal, such as graduating from college.
Explanation:
In sociology, a group is an association of two or more people who gather together for a number of common interests, shared identity, or any other reason, and that identify themselves as belong to said group. There are two types of groups: primary and secondary groups. Primary groups are those where the bonds between the members of the group are closer, longer lasting, more intimate, and more emotionally important. Family and close friends are the prime examples of primary groups. Secondary groups, on the other hand, are larger than primary ones, and their members come together because of a shared goal or interest. <u>People usually join these groups to accomplish a specific goal, such as graduating from college</u>. School and work groups are common examples of secondary groups. While these groups are often impersonal, strong bonds can develop between some members of a secondary group and develop into a primary group.
<u>Answer:</u>
Late nineteenth-century, <em>Great Britain </em>believed that its was a superior civilization with laws, industry, values, and religion that had been a gift to the
world for centuries
<u>Explanation:</u>
It was Great Britain that claimed that they were the superior most in all aspects such as laws, culture, industrialisation, and religious values. They were the ones who first came up with the Industrial Revolution which bore an immense effect on their industrialisation and economy. Great Britain was then considered the most forward in technology and they also made strict laws to maintain their advancement. Christianity, which was the prevalent religion also played a very important role in developing their society.
The correct answer is b) a growing spirit of democracy and equality between classes”
In “Democracy in America” by Alexis de Tocqueville in 1831, he said in the first phrases:
<em>“Amongst the novel objects that attracted my attention during my stay in the United States, nothing struck me more forcibly than the general equality of conditions. (…) The more I advanced in the study of American society, the more I perceived that the equality of conditions is the fundamental fact from which all others seem to be derived, and the central point at which all my observations constantly terminated.”</em>
