Answer:
A. both Jonathan's and Joanna's cases
Explanation:
Legal implication: The term "legal implication" is described as a phenomenon that is considered as the consequences or results in which an individual in being involved something inappropriate according to the specific law. Legal implications can either be negative or positive.
Ethical implication: The term "ethical implication" is described as a phenomenon in which various matter is being considered based on an ethical viewpoint. It is considered as the human principle based on wrong and right.
In the question above, the correct answer is A.
Answer:
Yes. Southam's research was "more wrong"
Explanation:
They both didn't seek the informed consent of their patients and we're both wrong. However, Southam injected patients(both healthy and unhealthy) with cancerous cells to see how their bodies would react. This was terribly wrong seeing that he put unsuspecting patients in danger. Elsie on the other hand, collected tissue samples from his patients to conduct his research which is a clear violation of their rights but clearly not as deadly as Southam's.
The correct answer is the Tene Bimb0 Clan.
The Tene Bimb0 Clan refers to a group of five women who killed their husbands between 1983 and 1995 in San Francisco. These five women were all married to men much older to them, and each killed their husband by poisoning them with <em>digitalis -</em>a heart medicine made from foxglove flowers. The members of the Tene Bimb0 Clan proceeded to steal their dead husbands' assets, such as money, automobiles, jewelry, etc., after murdering them.
Answer
this is gonna be my best educated guess cause i don't have enough information but i think he went back to Rome to build some churches and spread to spread the words of Jesus
