Answer:
Exclamation of commitment
Explanation:
Escalation of commitment can be defined as the way in which a person is having challenges concerning a particular thing due to the difficulty or negative result in resolving it and instead of the person to abandon it, the individual did not relent.
Exclamation of commitment often occur in a situation in which an individual like a particular thing, in which such person continue to invest their money or resources on it despite not giving them positive outcome due to the resource they might have spent on it earlier making it difficult for them to have a change of mind concerning it, in which they might later abandoned it because it was unsuccessful.
Therefore This incident illustrates the group dynamic of: EXCLAMATION OF COMMITMENT
Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
He was looking for India, and he had thought he reached the rich country of India when he landed in the americas, Hence why native americans are called "indians"
I'm not sure what question 4 is. If you could add both the picture and the question, that would be great.
