Answer: LAST OPTION.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to solve for the variable "x" from the expression
, you need to follow these steps:
1) You need to multiply both sides of the equation by 3:

2) You need to multiply both sides of the equation by 6:
3) Finally, you can divide both sides of the equation by 15:

Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, 3.2 centimeters on the map is equivalent to 4 kilometers. We can use unitary method to find, how many kilometer/kilometers each centimeter corresponds to. Using the unitary method: Therefore, the scale of map represents 1.25 kilometers for each centimeter.
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
Answer:
please attach the picture of figure
Step-by-step explanation:
500 - 116 = 384 left to collect
384 divided into 3 weeks = 128
They must collect $128 per week in order to reach their goal of $500.