The maximum walking speed of the Giraffe is 1.41 times greater than the maximum walking speed of the Hippopotamus
<h3>Calculating Maximum speed</h3>
From the question, we are to determine how much greater the maximum walking speed of Giraffe is to that of Hippopotamus
From the give information,
The maximum walking speed, S, is given by
S = √gL
Where g = 32ft/sec
and L is the length of the animal's leg
Thus,
For a Giraffe with a leg length of 6 feet
S = √32×6
S = √192
S = 13.856 ft/sec
For a Hippopotamus with a leg length of 3 feet
S = √32×3
S = √96
S = 9.798 ft/sec
Now, we will determine how many times greater 13.856 is than 9.798
13.856/9.798 = 1.41
Hence, the maximum walking speed of the Giraffe is 1.41 times greater than the maximum walking speed of the Hippopotamus
Learn more on Calculating Speed here: brainly.com/question/15784810
#SPJ1
Answer:
f(-2) = -5
General Formulas and Concepts:
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
<u>Algebra I</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
f(x) = 3x + 1
f(-2) is x = -2
<u>Step 2: Evaluate</u>
- Substitute in <em>x</em>: f(-2) = 3(-2) + 1
- Multiply: f(-2) = -6 + 1
- Add: f(-2) = -5
Answer: a. The correlation coefficient of the data is positive.
Step-by-step explanation:
Estimated slope of sample regression line = 
Here , confidence interval : (-0.181, 1.529)
Estimated slope of sample regression line = 
![=\dfrac{1.348}{2}\\\\=0.674\ \ \ \ [\text{ positive}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%5Cdfrac%7B1.348%7D%7B2%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D0.674%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5B%5Ctext%7B%20positive%7D%5D)
⇒Correlation coefficient(r) must be positive, So a. is true.
But, d. and e. are wrong(0.674 ≠ 0 or 1.348).
We cannot check residuals or its sum from confidence interval of slope of a regression line, so b is wrong.
We cannot say that scatterplot is linear as we cannot determine it from interval, so c. is wrong
So, the correct option : a. The correlation coefficient of the data is positive.
STEP 1:
BAGS OF FOUR
find number of bags needed to total 74 apples
= 74 ÷ 4 apples/bag
= 18.5 bags
*must round up to 19 bags because we cannot buy a partial bag
STEP 2:
BAGS OF FOUR
calculate price of 19 bags of 4 apples per bag
= 19 bags * $5/bag
= $95 for 19 bags of 4 apples/bag
STEP 3:
BAGS OF SIX
find number of bags needed to total 74 apples
= 74 ÷ 6 apples per bag
= 12.3333 bags needed
*must round up to 13 bags because we cannot buy a partial bag
STEP 4:
BAGS OF SIX
calculate price of 13 bags of 6 apples per bag
= 13 bags * $7 per bag
= $91 for 13 bags of 6 apples/bag
ANSWER: The smallest cost to buy 74 apples is $91.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation: