8 gray buttons out of 20 buttons

jolli1 [7]

The two diagonals are equal in length and bisect each other. Every quadrilateral with both these properties is a rectangle. A rectangle is rectilinear:which means its sides meet at right angles.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can someone answer this question please please help me I really need it if it’s correct I will mark you brainliest .

Allisa [31]

Answer:

We divided the figure into 1 triangle and 2 rectangles.

Adding up the area of them, we get the total area:

A = 14 x (10 + 8 + 12 - 16)/2 + 8 x 5 + 6 x (12 + 8)

= 258 (yd2)

Hope this helps!

:)

5 0

3 years ago

A swimming pool is being drained so it can be cleaned. The amount of water in the pool is changing according to the función f(t)

TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

0 ≤ t ≤ 5.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the function $f(t)$ , $t$ is the independent variable. The domain of $f$ is the set of all values of $t$ that this function can accept.

In this case, $f(t)$ is defined in a real-life context. Hence, consider the real-life constraints on the two variables. Both time and volume should be non-negative. In other words,

$t \ge 0$ .
$f(t) \ge 0$ .

The first condition is an inequality about $t$ , which is indeed the independent variable.

However, the second condition is about $f$ , the dependent variable of this function. It has to be rewritten as a condition about $t$ .

$\begin{aligned} f(t) &\ge 0 &&\text{Assumption} \cr 80000 - 16000\, t& \ge 0 && \text{Definition of} ~ f \cr 80000 & \ge 16000\, t && \begin{aligned}&\text{Add $16000\, t$} \\[-0.5em] & \text{to both sides of the inequality}\end{aligned} \cr 5 &\ge t &&\begin{aligned}&\text{Divide both sides of} \\[-0.5em] & \text{the inequality by $16000$}\end{aligned} \cr t &\le 5 && \text{Flip the inequality}\end{aligned}$ .

Hence, t ≤ 5.

Combine the two inequalities to obtain the domain:

0 ≤ t ≤ 5.

6 0

3 years ago

For A Free 50 Points... Tell me how to give an answer the "Brainliest Answer" Thingy... Also the person who answers with how to

KatRina [158]

Answer:

ok so when a person answers a question and then theres two people who answered it a little crown will appear at the top and you can decide if you want to mark them brainliest for the answer, Brainliest means when you think or decide that it is the best answer theoretically.

Step-by-step explanation:

:c

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Topic: The Quadratic Formula

Finger [1]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The quadratic formula for a equation of form

ax²+bx + c = 0 is

$x= \frac{-b +- \sqrt{b^2-4ac} }{2a}$

For the first equation,

x²+3x-4=0,

we can match that up with the form

ax²+bx + c = 0

to get that

ax² = x²

divide both sides by x²

a=1

3x = bx

divide both sides by x

3 = b

-4 = c

. We can match this up because no constant multiplied by x could equal x² and no constant multiplied by another constant could equal x, so corresponding terms must match up.

Plugging our values into the equation, we get

$x= \frac{-3 +- \sqrt{3^2-4(1)(-4)} }{2(1)} \\= \frac{-3+-\sqrt{25} }{2} \\ = \frac{-3+-5}{2} \\= -8/2 or 2/2\\= -4 or 1$

as our possible solutions

Plugging our values back into the equation, x²+3x-4=0, we see that both f(-4) and f(1) are equal to 0. Therefore, this has 2 real solutions.

Next, we have

x²+3x+4=0

Matching coefficients up, we can see that a = 1, b=3, and c=4. The quadratic equation is thus

$x= \frac{-3 +- \sqrt{3^2-4(1)(4)} }{2(1)}\\= \frac{-3 +- \sqrt{9-16} }{2}\\= \frac{-3 +- \sqrt{-7} }{2}\\$

Because √-7 is not a real number, this has no real solutions. However,

(-3 + √-7)/2 and (-3 - √-7)/2 are both possible complex solutions, so this has two complex solutions

Finally, for

4x² + 1= 4x,

we can start by subtracting 4x from both sides to maintain the desired form, resulting in

4x²-4x+1=0

Then, a=4, b=-4, and c=1, making our equation

$x=\frac{-(-4) +- \sqrt{(-4)^2-4(4)(1)} }{2(4)} \\= \frac{4+-\sqrt{16-16} }{8} \\= \frac{4+-0}{8} \\= 1/2$

Plugging 1/2 into 4x²+1=4x, this works as the only solution. This equation has one real solution

7 0

3 years ago