Answer:- AAS postulate
Explanation:-
- AAS postulate tells that if two angles and a non-included side of a triangle to equal to the two angles and a non-included side of another triangle then the two triangles are said to be congruent.
Given:- One angle and one side of a triangle is equal to the one angle and one side of the other triangle.
We see there is one more pair of equal angles as they are vertically opposite angles . [See the attachment]
⇒ there is a triangle where two angles and a non-included side of a triangle to equal to the two angles and a non-included side of another triangle then the two triangles are said to be congruent.
⇒ The triangles are congruent [ by ASA postulate]
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
For APEX it’s C
(0.15/365 • 30) ($320)
Good luck my dudes!!