1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrRissso [65]
3 years ago
15

The Three-Fifths Compromise established that only three fifths of the state's slave population would be represented when

History
1 answer:
AleksandrR [38]3 years ago
4 0
D. True I believe I checked with my family
You might be interested in
5. What impacts did the women's movement have in the United<br> States?<br> Answer ASAP pleaseeeeeee
natka813 [3]

Answer:

For many years in the United States, women have been disenfranchised, this led to the birth of the movement that women should be allowed to vote also. The women's suffrage movement was a decades-long fight that was aimed to win the right to vote for women in the United States. It took the “fighters” and reformers of the movement nearly a century to win that right, However, disagreement over strategy tried to cripple the movement more than once before they eventually came out victorious.

The women suffrage movement has been regarded as "the first mass women's movement in US history". The result of the movement then however explain the reason women are allowed to vote today. Women backed the prohibition more than men

7 0
3 years ago
What did the emancipation proclamation claim to do? free all slaves free all slaves outlaw slavery outlaw slavery free slaves in
Komok [63]

Answer:

Free slaves in confederate states.

Explanation:

The Emancipation Proclamation is the proclamation issued by President Lincoln on January 1, 1863, freeing the slaves in those territories still in rebellion against the Union.  

The Presidential Executive Order known as the Liberation Proclamation is renowned for being the first widespread emancipation of Slaves in the Country, despite the fact that its overall effects were not fully realized. However, it did not immediately start to work.

Slavery was lawful in the South prior to the war, hence it was not possible to emancipate slaves there by executive order. However, when they opened fire on the U.S. Army while seeking to secede from the Union, the majority of the South willingly surrendered their Statehood and, thus, the authority of their State laws. Lincoln perceived an open window of opportunity to address slavery and went on to do so.

Although there was no longer a State Government in place, the territory that the Southern States had been inhabiting remained under the regular legal purview of the Federal Government.

Which meant that the land's legal standing changed to that of an American Territory, where only Federal Law was applicable.

Which implied that, by default, a President's Executive Order was paramount.

However, the EO's reason was to hinder the Confederate war effort, which depended largely on slave labor to deliver war supplies, build trenches, and other tasks that would be difficult if the slaves quit what they were working on and fled. On the other hand, unless the U.S. Army had gained control of disputed areas, giving the slaves freedom of action, the slaves couldn't really make a dash for it. Lincoln limited the legal applicability of the EP to Southern territory that the Army had retaken. Battle after battle

Naturally, the South eventually capitulated, and the Army took over rule over the whole region. Which meant that ALL of the millions of slaves in the Confederate South had been emancipated by the EP.

But a significant loose end existed. Four of the slave states in the South that bordered the North refused to engage in the official treason of "levying war against the USA" and continued to support the nation. These States' lawful State Law continued to permit slavery throughout the war, and as they never staged a revolt, the U.S. Army had no motive to seize control of those States.

The 13th Amendment, however, was quickly proposed and enacted to liberate the slaves in those four States and to replace the EP's power in the other Southern States with one that was far greater. Since the State Governments in the South would have obstructed the Amendment, this was done as soon as possible.

Lincoln seized a little window of opportunity that presented itself.

<h3>What were the reasons for the Emancipation Proclamation?</h3>

Contrary to common opinion, the North's endeavor to free Southern slaves did not trigger the outbreak of the Civil War. It was over the South's assertion that every state had the right to complete autonomy over its system of government. Even then, in the third year of the war, the Emancipation Proclamation was not even first presented. The Emancipation Proclamation provided the Union forces and the North a morale boost because it made the Civil War more than just a political conflict; it turned it into a conflict motivated by moral principles. The Civil War was, to put it mildly, tremendously unpopular.

Thank you,

Eddie

6 0
2 years ago
How does the third party work
katovenus [111]
A third party is a part that doesn’t fit the criteria of belonging to the two dominant parties of the US. In simple terms, it is any party that isn’t the two dominant parties (republican and democratic).
7 0
3 years ago
True or false Colonists used British traditions to shape written documents or constitutions.
Maslowich

Answer:

True

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Explain an action that congress could take to respond to the Arizona v. United States decision if it disagreed with the decision
marissa [1.9K]

Answer:

Congress could make the decision to provide subsidies to local governments.

Explanation:

Arizona v. United States was related to the power and freedom of authorities and representatives of local governments in relation to federal immigration laws. This autonomy could cause local governments to act in disagreement with federal immigration objectives. As a result, Congress decided that federal laws would be valid laws across the country, but local governments could establish their own guidelines regarding investigation of factors involving immigration.

Congress could have decided to provide subsidies to local governments that did not have the capacity to comply with federal immigration laws, so that they had sufficient resources to comply with them.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • people who had served as aides to president FDR worried that Truman was not qualified to handle world leadership. Evaluate Truma
    12·1 answer
  • What countries were on each side of the Cold War...
    9·1 answer
  • What was true about the military draft used in the civil war?
    14·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE ASAP!!!
    6·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ANSWER FOR GOOD ANSWER!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT one of the benefits of
    7·1 answer
  • B. Make Inferences Why do you think larger complex commu-
    12·1 answer
  • 1. What title did King William grant Otto von Bismarck?
    6·2 answers
  • Between 1607 and 1763, Americans gained control of their political and economic institutions. To what extent and in what ways do
    12·1 answer
  • Use each of these words in a sentence about the newly independent United states.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!