1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elenna [48]
2 years ago
11

11

Law
1 answer:
Nimfa-mama [501]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:jjju876

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What are the exponents of [a], [b], and [c] (in that order) in the rate law?.
dimulka [17.4K]

Answer:

k = rate constant

A & B = reactants

x & y = reactant orders

Given reaction:          aA + bB + C → dD + eE

Rate Law:                  Rate = k[A]q[B]r[C]s

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
100 points with brainliest & ill answer your questions you've posted!
irakobra [83]

Answer:

The main source of conflict was Parliament's insistence on closely regulating American commerce after the French and Indian War in 1763. While Parliament had always passed laws concerning the colonies, during the period of salutary neglect between 1660–1763, it failed to enforce those laws.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
2 years ago
Explain why it is sometimes nessessery to limit rights
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

It is necessary to limit individual rights because the fundamental rights are good but giving extra rights makes a person feel distinguished from the society and establish their supremacy.

In a democracy, the rights that are being written in the constitution of different countries is necessary but on the other hand, granting extra rights to the citizens can destroy democracy and establish a sense of helplessness.

That's it you need to know!

Hope it helps you mate!

5 0
2 years ago
What are the three arguments concerning the Integration angle in Affirmative Action? (Name all three and explain)
snow_tiger [21]

Answer Integration angle just means peoples perspective on integration!

Explanation:

I had a little trouble reading this so I apologize if it's not correct!

Try rewording the question as: What are 3 arguments people make against integration when it comes to affirmative action?

I sadly do not know the 3 arguments regarding integration in affirmative action, but I hope the way I reworded the question helps! The term "integration angle" is rather confusing.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3. Wind resistance
    8·1 answer
  • What is love and how do u know if its real ????
    15·2 answers
  • What type of law does a lawyer who works to protect non-citizens practice? Refugee law Immigration law International law Civil r
    6·1 answer
  • Anyone watch Dexter? If so I need to know your favorite character, Season, and Episode so I can go re watch it. Please and thank
    5·1 answer
  • Who is currently the president?
    10·2 answers
  • Why do robbers look for other boring stuff and leave a paper police are very smart
    14·1 answer
  • If super political action committees cannot donate directly to political campaigns how do they best support the campaigns
    10·2 answers
  • Why is there no one clear definition for a political conservative
    7·1 answer
  • 100 points with brainliest &amp; ill answer your questions you've posted!
    11·2 answers
  • The prt of the business cycle in which the economy starts to slow down is called
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!