No it's over : 7.3 , unless your prompts context is close to as in getting there or close in general?
Answer:
116.87
Step-by-step explanation:
c=
The Correct Answer is : 4x - 4 * 2
Hope This Helps :)
If it does please give brainliest answer xD
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
1 1/3 /
5/6
=
8/5 or 1 3/5
