It's unjust to treat anyone differently for irrelevant reasons generally.
Especially when men and women work equally hard and produce the same effects it is unjust to treat them differently due to their biological differences which might even not influence their work: there is then also no good reason to treat them differently.
Answer:
The given statement is True. According to social exchange theory, any of a person's resources can be traded for more, better, or different resources that another person possesses.
Explanation:
Social Exchange Theory is basically the study of social behaviors of two parties that interact to implement the cost benefit analysis to determine the risk and benefit factors associated with this interaction. The resources could be a lot, tangible and intangible, like money, intelligence, status, good looks, power, talent, fame, affection, etc.
So according to this theory, any of a person's resources can be traded for more, better or different resources that another person have.
Answer:
Stewart (1980) Halo Effect.
Explanation:
The halo effect refers to a form of cognitive bias in which our general opinion of an individual determines how we think or feel about their personality. When creating a first impression, noticing an initial desirable characteristic, maybe attractiveness or power may make the individual appealing, making it difficult to revise the impression on the basis of new or opposing details. As per the question, the different analyses of defendants for the same crime is an example of the Halo Effect.