Answer:
Political thinkers concluded that government is a contract between ordinary people and a ruler.
Philosophers sought ways to make society better.
Many people began to use reason and observation in studying the world.
Explanation:
Political thinkers concluded that government is a contract between ordinary people and a ruler. The social contract was theorized during the Enlightenment due to the mindset of human being born means they have natural rights.
Philosophers sought ways to make society better. Many philosophers, like John Locke, expressed their ideas of "a good life" in this time period.
Many people began to use reason and observation in studying the world. No one, except Conservatives, use believed in tradition as much as they did before.
Answer:
a. emphasized organic shapes and materials
Explanation:
- The characteristics of the modern architecture are that they are identified early modern architecture and the emphasis is on the organic characters and the size and the material content and thus forming a modern new design.
- They are based on the innovative technologies and use of the glass and the steel and is an idea of functionalism.
Via negativa hope this helps!
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer:
I would say
It decreased because new black code laws restricted holding office and voting. BUt not sure
Explanation:
Because the Congress refused to seat North Carolina’s newly elected representatives and senators, as well as those from other southern states. This congressional or “Radical Reconstruction” would delay North Carolina’s re-admittance to the Union for two and a half years.
