Answer:
The War Department was the United Kingdom government department responsible for the supply of equipment to the armed forces of the United Kingdom and the pursuance of military activity.
If the students now complete their homework, and the teacher no longer complains to the parents. This is an example of: Negative reinforcement.
<h3>What is Negative reinforcement?</h3>
Negative reinforcement can be defined as the process of using reinforcer to remove behavior that are unpleasant or undesiring behavior that are not acceptable.
Based on the given scenario the teacher is using negative reinforcement to stop the student unpleasant behavior so as to enables the students to always complete their homework,
Inconclusion this is an example of: Negative reinforcement.
Learn more about Negative reinforcement here:brainly.com/question/326299
Answer: the arrangement between two countries by which each has representatives in the other country
Behavioural theory would contend that homosexual orientation is the result of various reinforcements and punishments.
<h3>What is homosexuality?</h3>
Homosexuality is defined as behavior or romantic interest between members of the same gender. The definition of homosexuality as a sexual orientation is lasting pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or attractions" to individuals of the same gender. It also "refers to a person's sense of identity based on such behaviors and membership in a community of people who share similar interests," according to studies, in addition to such attractions. Along with bisexuality and heterosexuality, the three main categories of sexual orientation on the heterosexual-homosexual continuum include homosexuality.
To know more about homosexuality, Visit:
brainly.com/question/28145496
#SPJ4
Answer:
(C) Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Explanation:
In 1965, a case between three teenagers who wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam war and were subsequently suspended for failing to remove the armbands and Des Moines Independent Community School District appeared before the Supreme Court. In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court explained that all form of speech, both symbolic speech such as the protest with armbands are protected under the the first amendment right of freedom of speech and expression. The court concluded that freedom of speech includes as form of symbolic speech.