Answer: A. a car driven by someone speeding excessively causes an accident.
Explanation:
Strict liability is simply referred to as a liability that is without fault. According to strict liability, someone can be liable to commit a crime even though such person didn't intentionally cause the harm or wasn't in his or her good state of mind.
From the information given in the question, the situations that may result in a strict liability include a neighbor's pet tiger that escapes and mauls a child, a truck carrying nuclear waste that crashes when the driver falls asleep and a faulty car that causes an accident.
Answer:
The question is incomplete. These are the claims of the Classical Theory of Criminology;
- The first basic claim made by the classical theory of crime causation is that human beings are fundamentally rational, and most human behavior is the result of free will and rational choice.
- The classical theory believes that crime is a result of pain and pleasure which are the two central determinants of human behavior.
- The classical theory of crime causation is that to deter law violators punishment must be meted accordingly to serve as an example to others who would also violate this law.
- The classical theory of crime causation also believes that it cannot be denied that the root principles of right and wrong are in the nature of things.
- Also according to the classical theory, crime is an immoral behavior degrades the relationship quality that exists between individuals and society.
Explanation:
The classical theory is a school of thought popular in 18th century Europe. It believes that criminals were rational and that the severity of legal punishment should be restricted to the degree necessary for deterrence.
There are five key principles to understanding the classical school of thought. They are; Rationality, Hedonism, punishment and human rights
Answer:
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.
Explanation:
The 1831 Supreme Court case of the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was a court ruling between the Cherokee Nation, the petitioners, against the state of Georgia, the respondent.
In this court case, the Cherokees filed a complaint against the State of Georgia, asking if the state has any jurisdiction to impose laws on the Nation. This was because the state has promised Cherokee lands to Georgian settlers if they settle in the state. The court decided that since the Cherokees are a dependent nation, it cannot make any decision as it has no jurisdiction over the case. Thus, this means that the Cherokee Nation cannot have any legal recourse to stop the state from taking their lands. This case was then followed up by the 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling where the court ruled in favor of the Cherokee people.
Thus, the correct answer is Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.
Gender based violence laws protect citizens against human right violation. The laws protects mostly females due to them being considered as the weaker gender and them being taken advantage of.
The law protects females from r*pe and gives them an equal opportunity with the male gender in every aspect of life. They are protected against violence and genital mutilation.
Yes, laws are important. Laws are important because they protect our general safety, and ensure our rights as citizens.