Answer:
Suppose a senator considers introducing a bill to legislate a minimum hourly wage of $12.50.
Wage Labor Demanded Labor Supplied
$12.50 375,000 625,000
This will result in a surplus of labor (625,000 higher than 375,000)
Which of the following statements are true?
- Binding minimum wages cause structural unemployment. As with all price floors, a deadweight loss results, because the quantity supplied is much greater than the quantity demanded. In this case, the price of labor is the wage, and the deadweight loss = structural unemployment
-
In the absence of price controls, a surplus puts downward pressure on wages until they fall to the equilibrium.
Since a labor surplus exists, the price of labor should start to decrease in order to match the equilibrium price.
-
If the minimum wage is set at $12.50, the market will not reach equilibrium. The quantity supplied of labor is much greater than the quantity demanded for labor resulting in a surplus.
Answer: bro why would you eat a grasshopper
Explanation:
kinda sus ngl
Answer: the correct answer is call-to-action.
Explanation:
Answer:212121212212121212ggthdfb b bgf bv f fsbggrb
2121211212122121212121212
Explanation:
21
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Every January, the stock market earns above-normal returns.
Explanation:
Inside the Efficient Market Hypothesis or EMH, we can find the term "weak from efficiency" that states past price action do not influence the current stock price or it is not useful in order to predict future price movements. According to the same concept, the use of technical analysis or the suggestions of financial advisers is useless.
In that sense, option letter "C" indicates that <em>every January the stock market earns an above-normal return</em>, which clearly reflects that there is a repeated pattern in the stocks affecting their price during that specific month, something impossible to take place according to what "weak from efficiency" establishes.
