The answer to this question is the "Spotlight Effect". Hence, when a friend is giving a speech and she is worried because he just got an unflattering haircut. She has on his mind that everyone will look and stare at her bangs and will discuss her looks, an attractive hair. Her overestimation of the people's reaction is known as the spotlight effect.
The southern delegates to the Constitutional Convention were willing to accept the Three-Fifths Compromise because it increased the political influence of the South.
<h3>What is the Three-fifths compromise?</h3>
By the Three-fifths compromise, the Northern and Southern state's delegates at the United States Constitutional Convention of 1787 agreed that three-fifth of the population of slaves would be counted in determining representation and number of seats in the Congress.
It also would determine how much each state would pay in taxes.
The three-fifths compromise allowed Southern states more Representatives and more presidential electoral votes than if slaves had not been counted although slaves had no voting rights.
Therefore, the Three-fifths compromise increased the political influence of the South by granting them more representation and electoral power.
Read more about southern delegates accepting the three-fifths compromise at brainly.com/question/7663707
#SPJ1
Answer: Small states are easier to manage politically, while large states are more likely to be corrupt.
Explanation:
During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, large states claimed to deserve more of a voice due to their larger populations, so they demanded congressional representation to be based on population.
Smaller states, fearing being ignored if that happened, wanted equal representation.
Roger Sherman, based on the idea of small states being easier to be handle politically, and large states being more prone to corruption, proposed the Connecticut Compromise with Oliver Ellsworth, which granted equal representation in the Senate and representation by population in the House, in a bicameral system that provided a balance of power.
Answer:
d. unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to more than minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.
Explanation:
According to the Institutional Review Board guideline, if a study poses not more than minimal risk for it participants and meets other requirement such as not including protected classes or vulnerable populations, and not using intentional deception, the study will still qualify for expedited review. However, when vulnerable individuals are involved, a full review is required.
