When forced distribution is used to reduce leniency bias, this can cause <decreased trust> between employees if a pfp system is in place.
No its measured in Hertz Hz
Of course there is. On a simple level, consider a parent trying to locate their missing child. Someone might break into their social media accounts to see if there are messages that might help determine their whereabouts.
Consider a website hosting inappropriate pictures of children. Breaking into the server hosting the files and removing them is 100% ethical.
I'm sure you can think of more examples.
Answer:
Yes I do honestly : )
What about you ??
Explanation:
Hope this helped : )
Since I was the first one may i have brainiest : )
Answer:
a) Generate a new public and private key
Explanation:
You encrypt a message using the recipient's public key and the recipient decrypts the message using his own private key. Only the public key can be known by an external agent. The private key is for the individual and is not expected to be shared. In the event that the recipient cannot decrypt the message, it is unsafe to send one's private key to him. He does not even need one's private key to decrypt the message, he needs his own private key.
The best thing to do is to generate another means of security by generating new public and private key so that the sender encrypts the message with the new public key and the receiver decrypts it using his new private key.
Option B is wrong because, if the encryption is removed, the aim, which is to secure the message from intruders is not achieved.
