1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
koban [17]
3 years ago
6

The seperate but equal doctrine established by the supreme court in pleats v . ferguson (1896) upheld the legality of

History
1 answer:
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
6 0
The Separate but Equal Doctrine established by the Supreme Court in Pleats v . Ferguson (1896) upheld the legality of segregation in public places. 
You might be interested in
President who took over in 1932 and was known for his New Deal in response to the Great Depression.
trasher [3.6K]
President Franklin Delano Roseavelt
6 0
3 years ago
What is one reason that President George H.W. Bush wanted to avoid a long-term war in Iraq?
Tems11 [23]

Answer:

Other nations in the area did not support long-term U.S. involvement there.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How did the role of government change in the Byzantine Empire?
ra1l [238]

Answer:

his immediate successors, permanently changed the system of central government so that governors of the newly created large provinces or themes themata were now, in effect, provincial military commanders strategoi with civil responsibilities who were directly responsible to and reported

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following explains why to World War - was such poster the one below would have been produced?
xeze [42]

well what world war was it

4 0
2 years ago
How did marbury v. madison illustrate the supreme court's power of judicial review?
Leno4ka [110]
It did not establish judicial review. Judicial review had been used in state courts and lower federal courts prior to Marbury, and ruled a number of times that some laws were unconstitutional. In fact, even the Supreme Court used judicial review before Marbury to decide that a carriage tax was constitutional (Hylton v. United States). 

However, Marbury was the first case that the Supreme Court used to rule a law unconstitutional. They declared that a part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 which gave the US Supreme Court court original jurisdiction over writs of mandamus. The Court ruled that Congress does not have the authority to modify the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, therefore, it was unconstitutional.

<span>In a way, by doing so, the Supreme Court actually took away some of it's power that Congress had granted it because the Constitution did not grant Congress that power.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • At the wannsee conference in 1942 the Nazis made plans for
    5·2 answers
  • How did the play set not break?
    12·1 answer
  • What punishment would a violator of the Sherman Antitrust act face
    12·1 answer
  • What group did the colonies organize to fight against Great Britain?
    15·1 answer
  • Which subset of civil law regulates the relationships among individuals and among individuals and organizations?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following processes most directly helps create soil from rocks?
    10·1 answer
  • What best describes why the Boston tea party is considered such a significant event in US History?
    9·2 answers
  • How was life on the american homefront impacted by the cold war
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of slavery in the U.S. before the Civil War?
    11·2 answers
  • What was one economic effect of the French and Indian War on American colonists?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!