You are solving for the height. Use the formula:
c² - b² = a² in which c = hypotenuse
(13)² - (5)² = a²
Simplify
169 - 25 = a²
144 = a²
Isolate the a. Root both sides
√144 = √a²
a = √144
a = √(12 x 12)
a = 12
C) 12 feet is your answer
~
Answer:
c = 32/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Eliminate the fraction by mult. all terms by 8: 96 + 3c = 64.
Subtract 64 from both sides, obtaining: 3c = 32. Solving for c, c = 32/3.
Answer:
The two triangles are related by Side-Side-Side (SSS), so the triangles can be proven congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
There are no angles that can be shown to be congruent to one another, so this eliminates all answer choices with angles (SSA, SAS, ASA, AAA, AAS).
This leaves you with either the HL (Hypotenuse-Leg) Theorem or SSS (Side-Side-Side) Theorem. We could claim that the triangles can be proven congruent by HL, however, we aren't exactly sure as to whether or not the triangles have a right angle. There is no indicator, and in this case, we cannot assume so.
This leaves you with the SSS Theorem.
Answer:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
