1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Umnica [9.8K]
3 years ago
13

Carlos is five years older than twice his sister's age. carlos is 13.which equation and solution correctly identifies his sister

's age?2x - 5 = 13; x = 92x 5 = 13; x = 42x - 5 = 13; x = 42x 5 = 13; x = 9
Mathematics
2 answers:
oee [108]3 years ago
5 0
C=carlo=13
x=sister


carlos (13) is (=) 5 years older (5+) twice sisters age (2 times x)
13=5+2x
mius 5 both sides
13-5=5-5+2x
8=0+2x
8=2x
divide both sides by 2
4=x

2x+5=13
x=4
Bogdan [553]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

2x+5=13

x=4

Step-by-step explanation:

Carlos is five years older than twice his sister's age. carlos is 13.

Let x represents the sister's age

Carlos age = twice of sisters age plus 5 years

twice of sister's age means 2 times sister's age

Carlos age = 2x+5

Now Carlos age is 13

So the equation is 13= 2x+5

Now we solve for x to find the solution

2x+5=13

Subtract 5 from both sides

2x=8

Divide both sides by 2

x=4

You might be interested in
Please help I don’t understand these things
devlian [24]
This means the sum of the measure of these two angles will be 55+x=90
so x=90-55=35
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Solve the following:<br><br>a) 3x+4/2 = 9.5<br><br><br>b) 7+2x/3= 5​
kodGreya [7K]

Answer:

A) x=2.5

B) x=-3

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
3. A team of eye surgeons has developed a new technique for a risky eye operation to restore the
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

Yes the new method if sample size was less than 20 than that of old method or identical sample numbers of old and new the differences still prove the new operation is better. As 88 patients minus 1% still shows us 76.7475 significance of  old method being low point 67.5 = 30% of 225 and proved a 65.25 low point and 69.75 high point which is also a 20% jump to new methods low point significance.

You cna show this as workings to prove or follow any of the below statements.

Where new method of 88 patients -0.01 significance rate stands at 76.7475. This figure has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients to 76.7 we compare this to the old method if reversing significance we find  = 62.5 and it's 30% standing value of 67.5  as +1% increase shows us 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

Step-by-step explanation:

88/225  = 0.39111111111 = 39.11%%

P value 01 = 1%  =  225.225 or 5% range of alternative hypotheses.

To graph the P value we take the distance between the sample mean and the null hypothesis value (225 + 1% of sample - x nhv) = y ). We can graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean  (225 +/- ( x +1% of sample) where nhv has a decimal if needed to utilize the 1% added). we would replace nvp in this example with  Ha or H1 which means the alternative hypotheses as the data shows less than or equal to.

We can then show 225.225 -  Ha or H1  then graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean that is at least extreme in both tails  Ha or H1

However it would be the other way round where you take the first set of data and use the sample as the 30% significance of that sample indicates it may be a larger sample or a higher significance. Therefore this would be used in the graphing - 1%

We prove that 30-1 =29  where 29% of 225 = 225 x 0.29 = 65.25

this way we have proved that the new set of data being equal to 88 patients regaining their eyesight is <23 and can be written like this 65.25< x <88

This means that sample mean has taken the 1% to show on the graph we can show 225> 33.11 +1 .

We can prove that both indifference of significance would reduce when 1% is added and close based on being a higher percentage to begin with.

34.11 = 0.3411 x 225 = 76.7475 for second surgeon = 33.11% +1

Where as shown

30 = 0.3 x 225 = 67.5

76.5475 - 67.5 = 9.04 difference when comparing old method = +1%

where new method stands at 76.7475 has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients and where old method if reversing = 62.5 and has reduced from 67.5  as +1% and 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

You would therefore graph each higher methods first if comparing both by 0.01 or show 88 on graph and 76.7475 = +1%

NB/ if sample size was 20 more in the old data then 225+20 = 245 x 0.29 = 71.05 and would still be lower than new data. = 2.0 increase level of significance and not relevant unless you are looking for the decrease which means new is greater than 20% success than that of old method findings where 30% = 67.5.

5 0
3 years ago
the measurement of an angle is five times less than the measurement of its supplement what is the measurement of the angle a. 30
Levart [38]
Let the angle be y;
Then the supplement is 5y
y+5y=180
6y=180
y=30
The angle is 30 degrees
8 0
3 years ago
Kelly has 4 times as many songs on her music player as Lou. Tiffany has 6 times as many songs on her
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

113

Step-by-step explanation:

we need to know how much Lou has first !

so we have to do 682 / 6 which = 113

then 113 / 4 = 28.2

28.2 is how much Lou has

so we will go back and multiply the 4

28.2 x 4 =113

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When you multiply 2/3 by a fraction less than one, how does the product compare to the facotrs
    10·2 answers
  • Prove that the equation is an identity. tan A tan B = tan A + tan B cot A + cot B Working from the right-hand side, use the trig
    13·1 answer
  • What is the sign of -x/-y when x&gt;0 and y &gt;0?
    10·1 answer
  • Difference between upper quartile &amp; lower quartile
    7·1 answer
  • .Julisa's pool has an area of 196ft squared. what is the perimeter of the pool?
    15·1 answer
  • The number of toys owned by eight classmates is shown below:
    6·2 answers
  • Write an algebraic expression for each word expression:<br> 3.8 times a number z
    9·1 answer
  • I am confused on this , I’ve tried twice and got it wrong.
    11·1 answer
  • Question 14 of 25
    8·1 answer
  • Complete the inequality statement.<br><br> 13.01 ___ 13.1<br><br> 1. =<br> 2. &gt;<br> 3.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!