1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bezzdna [24]
4 years ago
13

Jing Company was started on January 1, Year 1 when it issued common stock for $50,000 cash. Also, on January 1, Year 1 the compa

ny purchased office equipment that cost $34,000 cash. The equipment was delivered under terms FOB shipping point, and transportation cost was $2,000. The equipment had a five-year useful life and a $12,000 expected salvage value. Using double-declining-balance depreciation, what the amount of depreciation expense and the amount of accumulated depreciation, respectively, that would appear on the December 31, Year 3 financial statements?
Business
1 answer:
arsen [322]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Depreciation expense - year 3 = $5184

Accumulated depreciation - Year 3 = 23040 + 5184 = $28224

Explanation:

The Financial reporting standards state that the cost of a fixed asset should include the purchase cost and all the costs necessary to bring the asset to the place and in the condition necessary for its use as intended by the management. Thus, the transportation cost will be capitalized as in FOB Shipping Point, the buyer pays for the transportation.

Cost of office equipment = 34000 + 2000 = $36000

Th double declining balance method is an accelerated method to charge depreciation in which higher depreciation is charged in the initial years and lower in the later years.

The formula for depreciation expense under this method is,

Depreciation expense = 2 * [(Asset cost - Accumulated depreciation)/Estimated useful life of the asset]

Depreciation expense - year 1= 2 * [(36000 - 0) / 5

Depreciation expense - year 1 = $14400

Depreciation expense - year 2 = 2 * [(36000 - 14400) / 5]

Depreciation expense - year 2 = $8640

Accumulated depreciation - year 2 = 14400 + 8640 = 23040

Depreciation expense - year 3 = 2 * [(36000 - 23040) / 5]

Depreciation expense - year 3 = $5184

Accumulated depreciation - Year 3 = 23040 + 5184 = $28224

You might be interested in
Classify each of the following financial statement items based upon the major balance sheet classifications. select a major bala
seropon [69]

Answer:

Prepaid Advertising - Current Asset

Equipment - Property, Plant, and Equipment

Trademarks - Intangible Assets

Salaries and Wages payable - Current Liabilities

Income Tax payable - Current Liabilities

Retained Earnings - Stockholder's Equity

Account Receivable - Current Assets

Land (Held for future use) - Long term Investment

Patents - Intangible Asset

Bonds Payable - Long term Liability

Common Stock - Stockholder's Equity

Accumulated Depreciation -  Property, Plant, and Equipment

Unearned sales revenue - Current Liability

Explanation:

Balance Sheet of a company has different heads under which items are classified according to their nature. The major account heads for classification are Assets, Liabilities and Equity.

Prepaid Advertising and Account receivable are classified as current asset because this is expected to be used within a year.

Equipment is classified as Long term asset under the head, Property, Plant and Equipment. The equipment has estimated useful life more than a year then it is classified as Long term asset.

Trademarks and patents are classified as intangible assets, because they are not physical in nature.

Salaries and Wages payable, Income Tax payable and Unearned sales revenue are classified as Current liabilities. These expenses are due to pay within a year.

Retained Earnings and Common Stock are classified as Stockholders equity. The amount after subtracting all liabilities from total assets is referred to as Stockholder equity.

Accumulated depreciation is deducted from Property, Plant and Assets. This has negative sign and is a contra asset account.

5 0
3 years ago
Jose wants to be sure he maintains a high credit score as he is planning to buy a new car soon. What should he do to ensure his
Firlakuza [10]
D: Pay off his credit card balance each month


7 0
3 years ago
For each of the following annuities, calculate the annual cash flow. (Enter rounded answers as directed, but do not use rounded
jeyben [28]

Answer:

(A)  $   2,602.34

(B)  $    4,156.97  

(C)  $   8,233.47

(D)  $ 46,796.64

Explanation:

We need to solve for the PMT of an ordinary annuity:

FV \div \frac{(1+r)^{time} -1}{rate} = C\\

(A)

FV 24,850

time   8

rate           0.05

24850 \div \frac{(1+0.05)^{8}-1 }{0.05} = C\\

C  $ 2,602.337

(B)

FV 1,030,000

time:    43

rate        0.07

1030000 \div \frac{(1+0.07)^{43} -1}{0.07} = C\\

C  $ 4,156.972

(C)

FV 856,000

time   29

rate             0.08

856000 \div \frac{(1+0.08)^{29} -1}{0.08} = C\\

C  $ 8,233.466

(D)

FV 856,000

time    14

rate        0.04

856000 \div \frac{(1+0.04)^{14} -1}{0.04} = C\\

C  $ 46,796.641

5 0
3 years ago
An organizationally-driven reason for outsourcing is that it can improve effectiveness by focusing on what the firm does best.
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Outsourcing is when a company gives some of its internal activities to an external party that takes the responsibility to get things done and one of the reasons for a company to do this is to get rid of activities that have to get done but that are not part of their core operations to be able to concentrate on their main activity and get those things done by experts which can help increase productivity. According to that, the answer is that the statement is true.

6 0
3 years ago
Case: Keller v. Central Bank of Nigeria
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

1.Parties [Identify the plaintiff and the defendant] - The plaintiff is Henry Keller of H.K.Enterprises and the defendant is Bank of Nigeria and Nigerian individuals Central Bank of Nigeria, Paul Ogwuma, ?Alhaji Rasheed, Alhaji M.A. Sadiq.

2.Facts [Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case] - The case was filed by Keller against the defendants in United States. The case was filed under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) as the plaintiff found himself a victim of fraud and financial scam.The scam occured when one of the defendants approached the plaintiff who was the sales representative of medical equipments for granting him the distribution rights for Nigeria. The expected amount of money was not transferred in the account of plaintiff inspite of his attempts of meeting the requirements of the defendants. The defendants acted on the behalf of Central Bank of Nigeria and as Nigerian individuals.

3.Procedure [Who brought the appeal? What was the outcome in the lower court(s)?] - The appeal was filed by the defendants Central Bank of Nigeria,?Paul Ogwuma, Alhaji Rasheed, Alhaji M.A. Sadiq. The lower court gave the decision that the claims of fraud and misrepresentation do not hold against the defendants as the plaintiff entered into an arrangement with them which is not legal and as per the rules. However the lower court ruled that immunity cannot be given under FSIA to the defendants as the commercial activity is an exception and claims for violation of RICO are applicable on them.

4. Issue [Note the central question or questions on which the case turns] - The case turns on the appeal of defendants to be granted immunity under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The ruling indicated that the defendants have sovereign authority. Also, the commercial activity clause did not apply in this case as the activity was not done in United States and did not meet the legal standards of a commercial activity.

5.Explain the applicable law(s). - Applicable laws are Common law fraud, violations of RICO(Rackteer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act), Misrepresentation.

6.Holding [How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?] - The court resolved the issue by giving a decision in the favor of defendants by ruling that immunity is given to Foreign nationals under FSIA and dismissed any claims filed against them under RICO.

7.Reasoning [Explain the logic that supported the court's decision] - The logic supporting the court's decision is that the arrangement between the plaintiff and defendants including the signed contract was not as per the laws and rules and was not legally compliant. Moreover the commercial activity was out of bounds for United states so the exception to FISA is not applicable. The defendants claimed that they did not enter into the contract with the plaintiff.

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the net operating income for the month under absorption costing?
    15·1 answer
  • Merchandise Inventory increased $ 28 comma 000 and Accounts Payable decreased $ 19 comma 600 during the year. Accounts Payable r
    7·1 answer
  • Outfitters sells recreational equipment. One of the company’s products, a small camp stove, sells for $90 per unit. Variable exp
    11·1 answer
  • A store purchases televisions from a factory for $\$$87.89 each. The store normally sells one of these televisions for 225$\%$ o
    9·2 answers
  • ¿Qué nuevos productos puede incluir un restaurante en su oferta? ¿Por qué?
    14·1 answer
  • An employee’s ability to perform his or her job effectively is referred to as
    15·1 answer
  • How should the law deal with threats by private-sector employers to abandon all or parts of their domestic operations for overse
    5·1 answer
  • Explain briefly why manufacturing offers so many careers in such varied fields.
    11·2 answers
  • TufStuff, Inc., sells a wide range of drums, bins, boxes, and other containers that are used in the chemical industry. One of th
    12·1 answer
  • A work breakdown structure must be decomposed at least four levels in order to be effective. true false
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!