In our analysis of economics and culture, the substantivists argue that sometimes profit motives are alien to non-western societies. Substantivists is a position in which there are two meanings of the word economy. In this case, depending on the situation profit and motives may be motivating and meaningful to different people based on their economic situation.
The concept that Marsiglia and Kulis are referring to from the statement mentioned in the question is a term called intersectionality.
Intersectionality is a concept that is generally defined as <em>a framework that acknowledges how an individual is impacted by various systems of power – and his or her position in each system, when combined would create a different experience in how an individual would be treated by the society at large. </em>
For example, an individual who identifies as Black, is female, has an upper middle class income, is heterosexual would navigate life differently from someone who is White, male, has a lower class income, and is homosexual.
This makes no sense i need more details
The reason that you need a helper when backing a loaded
truck is because the mirrors of the truck doesn’t let you see directly behind
its trailer as it is big enough that it hides the back view, preventing you to
see it.
Do you mean how many live there now?
