Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because it helps tourism and helps bring development through abroad investors seeing the landmarks and quantity of the country economy
Numerous reasons including:
1. Weak central government, all power in the hands of the state governments
2. Couldn't collect taxes
3. Couldn't regulate interstate commerce
4. Needed 9/13 to pass laws
5. Needed all 13 states to pass an amendment, difficult for everyone to agree
6. Couldn't raise an army
7. No President to run things
8. States didn't have to respect treaties of the central government
<u>Answer:</u>
This case was not meant to be a precedent and It was decided in a 5–4 vote.
Option: (A) and (B)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The Bush v/s Gore case of 2000 was unusual because the Supreme Court decision in the case ordering the initial count to be considered as final brought a wave of mixed responses throughout the United States.
- The decision was voted 5-4 by the Supreme Court bench of 9 justices hearing the case.
- The critics interpreted from the judgment issued that the case was not meant to be taken as a precedent for any cases in the future.
