1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vredina [299]
2 years ago
6

What incidents highlighted key weaknesses of the articles of confederation

Law
1 answer:
lesantik [10]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Articles

The Articles of Confederation only set up the Continental Congress at the federal level. There were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. The states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to Congress. The bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. States were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

Strengths

Not many historians today talk about the strengths of the Articles of Confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. The Articles did set the legislative body, Congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. Congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. Disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to Congress. The document also stipulated that Canada was allowed to enter the Union if they desired.

Weaknesses

There were more weaknesses than strengths under the Articles of Confederation. The lack of power given to the Continental Congress strangled the federal government. The Articles gave Congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. If a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. Congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. Without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. Amending the Articles of Confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.

Source: https://study.com/academy/lesson/articles-of-confederation-strengths-weaknesses-quiz.html

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
Question 11 (5 points)
AysviL [449]
Stimulates because they are usually downers
3 0
1 year ago
You’re called to a large fight in progress numerous people injured and hurt. EMS is en route. There are 3-4 witnesses and 2 comb
garri49 [273]

Answer:

RUN. Periodttttttt

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you were a defense attorney, what would you want the jurors to know about the limits of forensic evidence?
OlgaM077 [116]

The results indicate that the 10 pieces of evidence mock jurors reported would be most important when deciding a verdict are (in order of importance): (1) DNA, (2) fingerprints, (3) weapon, (4) video records, (5) crime-scene photos, (6) gunshot residue, (7) other bodily secretions, (8) video confession, (9) forensic ...

7 0
2 years ago
What potential conflict of interest is presented by a lawmaker accepting an
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

A term used to describe the situation in which a public official or fiduciary who, contrary to the obligation and absolute duty to act for the benefit of the public or a designated individual, exploits the relationship for personal benefit, typically pecuniary.

In certain relationships, individuals or the general public place their trust and confidence in someone to act in their best interests. When an individual has the responsibility to represent another person—whether as administrator, attorney, executor, government official, or trustee—a clash between professional obligations and personal interests arises if the individual tries to perform that duty while at the same time trying to achieve personal gain. The appearance of a conflict of interest is present if there is a potential for the personal interests of an individual to clash with fiduciary duties, such as when a client has his or her attorney commence an action against a company in which the attorney is the majority stockholder.

Incompatibility of professional duties and personal interests has led Congress and many state legislatures to enact statutes defining conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest and specifying the sanctions for violations. A member of a profession who has been involved in a conflict of interest might be subject to disciplinary proceedings before the body that granted permission to practice that profession.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements about alcohol consumption is CORRECT?
Bad White [126]

Answer: the answer is A i think

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Criminologists Richard Hawkins and Geoffrey Alpert Observe that the work of correctional officers is characterized by both
    7·1 answer
  • Why do you have to be 18 or older, in most states, to drive?
    5·2 answers
  • What does "200 ft." mean to a driver when we are talking about: A horn? A rear-view mirror?
    6·1 answer
  • Which law is unjust in South African law?and how can you change it<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • While reviewing a set of fingerprints, the law enforcement database identified a ridge characteristic in which one ridge formed
    12·1 answer
  • Points<br>.............​
    8·1 answer
  • What is the name for the series of declarations that details a political party's position on election issues?
    11·1 answer
  • ¿El cumplimiento de mis derechos y deberes depende de m ? ¿Porqe?
    15·1 answer
  • A pedestrian may if there aren't sidewalks
    7·1 answer
  • At the trial court level, the plaintiff (Beth Smiles) prevails. What is the basis of the defendant’s (Coastal) appeal?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!