For a corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee, the prosecutor does not have to prove that the employee was receiving a benefit from the criminal act.
Option e
<u>Explanation:</u>
An entity that exists only through its employees and their functions is called as an corporation. Although, a corporation may be held liable for various criminal activities, for example: the employee did that criminal act in the scope of employment, the failure in performing an affirmative duty.
Corporations must perform certain responsibilities and duties to which they are bound to, if unable to perform those duties, it may result in criminal liability. However, a criminally liable company's prosecutor does not have to prove that the "employee was trying to receive some benefit from the criminal act".
Answer:
D. All of the Above
Explanation:
Jails, are in fact, described as correctional after- thoughts by scholars, hold multi faced and critical roles in communities and have often been neglected.
Answer:
C, through your stomach and small intestine
Explanation:
Because that your body also absorbs the nutrients of the alcohol first, so it has to pass through your stomach to do so.
After the case <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> established that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court mandated that all schools be desegregated. However, it was not clear how this was to be done. Eventually, in <em>Brown II</em>, the Court asked that desegregation be carried out "with all deliberate speed."
Many people criticized this order as too ambiguous. The criticism appears to have been fair, as it seems to have allowed Southern states to avoid integration for years. Many school districts resisted, delayed or avoided significant integration through various strategies, and the Court was unable to enforce a clear action. Therefore, the implementation of the Supreme Court order was not very successful.
Answer: another lawyer or person is appointed by the judicial service commission
