The above answer is definitely correct in its details. I'd just like to emphasize a couple of important ideas about Hoover's response.
<span>He tried to do more to fix the economy than any president had ever done before. The government had been very hands-off up to that point.He believed the government should not go in debt no matter what. This limited what he was willing to do. Please note that economists back then agreed with this idea so it's not like Hoover was just being mean. In fact, FDR believed the same thing and it's often said that he undermined the New Deal by trying to balance the budget too soon.</span>
So, overall what I want to point out is that Hoover did more than anyone else, and he did what most economists of the time would have said was the right thing to do. But it didn't work and so he's seen as one of the worst presidents ever, which seems a bit unfair.
Answer:
return of the asset = 13.94%
return of the asset = 13.11%
return of the asset = 11.46 %
Explanation:
given data
average return = 14.60 percent
geometric average return = 10.64 percent
observation period = 25 years
solution
we get here return of the asset over year by Blume formula that is
return of the asset = ( T- 1 ) ÷ ( N - 1) × geometric average + ( N -T) ÷ ( N - 1) × arithmetic average ..................1
here N is observation period and T is time
put value in equation 1
return of the asset =
return of the asset = 0.1394 = 13.94%
and
return of the assets = 
return of the asset = 0.13115 = 13.11%
and
return of the assets = 
return of the asset = 0.11465 = 11.46 %
Answer:
The answer is option (C) authority-compliance style.
Explanation:
The authority-compliance style In the context of the Blake/Mouton leadership grid describes when managers or bosses are overly concerned about the effectiveness with which their employees or subordinates get work done without regard for the well being of such employees.
This kind of dictatorial management style is due to the fact that a manager or boss believes that the needs of his/her subordinates or employees are relatively unimportant when compared to achieving success or getting work effectively done.
It would be an informative resource