Answer:
The answer is: C) Attitude of others
Explanation:
The attitude of others refers to how much can another person´s attitude reduce what someone else prefers to buy. The extent of how much can a third party influence our purchasing decisions is based on:
- How intense is the third party´s negative attitude toward buying that specific product.
- How motivated we are to comply with the other person´s attitude.
Answer:
64,313.74 ; 95,559.38 ; 47,283.11
Explanation:
by definition the present value of an annuity is given by:
where 
is the present value of the annuity, 
is the interest rate for every period payment, n is the number of payments, and P is the regular amount paid. so applying to this particular problem, we have:
1. P=8,200, n=25, i=12%
2. P=8,200, n=25, i=7%
3. P=8,200, n=25, i=17%
Answer:
She was involved in objectionable self-dealing.
Explanation:
Wendy was the president of a business, which made the product she started to make individually at her home, after learning it from the business.
That clearly reflects that the business might have provided the knowledge to Wendy, but using that knowledge in benefit of the self and not of the company, is a unethical act on the part of the individual.
Here Wendy the president of company, rather than promoting the products of the company promoted the products she manufactured individually at her home. This clearly proves that she is self oriented in a negative manner which is a loss for the company.
Her acts are objectionable.
The option that's true about Padraig’s gross pay and total employee benefits is "His total employee benefits are 12.5% of his annual gross pay of $64,000"
His annual gross pay is $64,000, his employment benefits will be:
= 12.5% × $64000
= 12.5/100 × $6400
= 0.125 × $64000
= $8000
Therefore, the annual compensation will be:
= $64000 + $8000
= $72000
In conclusion, the correct option is C.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/23770424
