Answer:
$25
Explanation:
The production cost is $275.
The selling price is $250
The loss/profit will be: Selling price minus cost price
=$250 - $275
= -$25
A loss of $25.
If this is the cost for all the 135 TVs, then the loss is only $25.
N:B
If the costs are for one TV, then the loss will be $25 x 135=$3,375
Economic wants are the products and goods that people need and want; if they had unlimited purchasing power, they would want to obtain all of them.
In contrast economic preferences are compared to something, so while you might prefer one thing to another, you might not necessarily need it, or you might even need and want both of them!
Answer:
The optimal hedge is 0.642 and it means that the size of the future positions should be 64.2% of the exposure of the company in a 3 month-hedge.
Explanation:
optimal hedge ratio
= coefficient of correlation*(standard deviation of quarterly changes in the prices of a commodity/standard deviation of quarterly changes in a futures price on the commodity)
= 0..8*(0.65/0.81)
= 0.642
Therefore, The optimal hedge is 0.642 and it means that the size of the future positions should be 64.2% of the exposure of the company in a 3 month-hedge.
Answer & Explanation:
a). The contract between Lisa and Bob is valid and enforceable as a valid contract is an agreement between parties lacking no element. The contract was very detailed and well discussed regardless of Bob drinking it is still enforceable unless Bob can proof that the intoxication impaired his judgement and made him incompetent to sign the contract thereby making it void.
b). The contract will be valid if Bob signed it before the drinks arrived as the document was complete and his signature show acceptance of the terms of the contract.
c). A minor can not enter into a contract as they may lack the capacity to enter into a valid contract. As such, if Bob was a minor regardless of him being sober any contract signed by him can be completely voidable.
