Answer:
A. The French and Dutch relied heavily on trade alliances with Native Americans, while the Spanish did not.
Explanation:
In the paragraph it follows that Samuel de Champlain who was a French explorer, talks about his contact with the Algonquians in a positive and friendly way. He speaks of friendship, of joint coexistence and of trade in techniques as well as providing settlers with part of what the natives hunt in exchange for goods that the French can give in return to the natives.
This differs from the approach of the Spaniards who, although they initially traded small quantities of objects such as mirrors for gold ornaments, focused solely on the exploitation and use of natives for their own gains, forced conversion and slavery.
Answer:
The correct option is B: the deliberate effort by organizational buyers to build relationships that shape suppliers' products, services, and capabilities to fit a buyer's needs and those of its customers
Explanation:
Supplier development is based on the idea of establishing a one-to-one relationship between organizational buyers and suppliers. This establishes a commitment between both parties that help improve their performance to meet the buyer's requirements.
The Pacinian corpuscles are responsible for the perception of rapid vibrations, such as you would experience when using a hand-held massager.
In the bone periosteum, joint capsules, pancreas and other viscera, breast, and genitals, Pacinian corpuscles are found deep in the dermis of both glabrous and hairy skin. They are structurally similar to Meissner's corpuscles. They are fast adapting mechanoreceptors that detect high-frequency vibration and deep brief (but not persistent) pressure. By being crushed, The pacinian receptors sense vibration and pressure by stimulating their internal dendrites. Skin has less Merkel's disks and Meissner's corpuscles than Pacinian corpuscles and Ruffini endings.
Learn more about Pacinian corpuscles here.
brainly.com/question/28167175
#SPJ4
Answer:
This scenario most likely exemplifies <u>expectancy confirmation</u>.
Explanation:
The expectation confirmation model conceives satisfaction as the result of a contrast or comparison between the reality perceived by the individual and some type of comparison standard (expectations, norms based on experience, etc.). The propositions of the model are satisfaction is related to the degree and direction of the discrepancy between expectations and performance. Producing what has been called confirmation of expectations when the performance is initially expected, negative disconfirmation, when the performance is lower than expected, then dissatisfaction appears.
