Not all resources of a given type are identical: Customers differ in size and profitability, staff differ in experience, and so on. This chapter will show you the following:
how to assess the quality of your resources
how resources bring with them potential access to others
how you can improve resource quality
how to upgrade the quality of an entire strategic architecture
6.1 Assessing the Quality of Resources
Few resources are as uniform as cash: Every dollar bill is the same as all the others. Most resources, however, vary in important ways:
Customers may be larger or smaller, highly profitable or less so.
Products may appeal to many customers or few, and satisfy some, many, or all of their needs.
Staff may have more experience or less, and cost you high salaries or low.
A single resource may even carry several characteristics that influence how the resource stock as a whole affects other parts of the system. Individual bank customers, for example, feature different balances in their accounts, different numbers of products they use from the bank, different levels of risk of defaulting on loans, and so on. A resource attribute is a characteristic that varies between different items in a single pool of resources. These differences within each type of resource will themselves change through time. For example, if we lose our most profitable customers our operating profits will fall faster than if we lose only average customers.
Drifting off the pavement will cause front tire traction loss. When you understeer on a slippery surface around a bend or curve, you lose front tire traction.
<h3 /><h3>What is tire traction?</h3>
Traction is described as "the capacity of a wheel or tire to maintain contact with the ground without slipping." This is especially critical while driving on slick terrain, such as snow.
<h3>What factors influence tire traction?</h3>
Traction is created when multiple forces push against one another at the same time, forming a strong grip between them.
In the instance of a car, we have the weight of the vehicle, the immovability of the road, the power of the engine, and the amount of flexibility a tire possesses.
Learn more about Tire traction:
brainly.com/question/28102749
#SPJ1
Answer:
- Five internal controls
- Control procedures.
- Risk Assestment.
- Information and communication.
- Monitoring.
- Control environment.
Explanation:
1. <u>Five internal</u> control environment risk assessment control procedures monitoring information and communication.2. <u>Control procedures</u> provides reasonable assurance that business goals will be achieved.3. <u>Risk assessment</u> identify, analyze and assess likeliness of vulnerabilities.4. <u>Information and communication</u> used by management for guiding operations and ensuring compliance with requirements.5. <u>Monitoring</u> used to locate weaknesses and improve controls.6. <u>Control environment</u> overall attitude of management and employees
There are five internal control management that help in controling and managing overall work environment.
Answer:
Incentive systems are so attractive to leaders who attempt to implement organizational change because they are powerful tools that can influence and motivate workers to embrace organizational change.
Explanation:
Incentive systems promote and encourage specific workers' actions or behavior. They are particularly used in businesses to motivate employees to adopt certain behaviors during a change transition by management. Studies have shown that if correct incentive systems are correctly selected, implemented, and monitored, they can increase team performance by an average of 44 percent. This improved performance makes incentive systems attractive to leaders who are implementing organizational changes.
Answer:
C) the safety and soundness of the financial system in aggregate.
Explanation:
Macroprudential regulation focuses on reducing systemic risk.
Systemic risk is the financial risk associated with an event from a specific company damaging the whole financial system. Systemic risk was responsible for the collapse leading to the Great Recession (2008-2010).
The "too big to fail" policy is an example of macroprudential regulation.
