The inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
<h3>What do you mean by inverse?</h3>
Inverse of the statement means that explain the condition in reverse way or vice versa.
Since, M is the midpoint of PQ, then PM is congruent to QM.
Proving in reverse way, let m be the point between P and Q the distance M from P is equal to the distance from M to Q. Which implies that M lies as the mid of the P and Q.
Thus, the inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
Learn more about inverse here:
brainly.com/question/5338106
#SPJ1
Yes. Changing the the word problem into a function, you get 30x=y.
30 = Fixed Length
x = width
y = area
No matter what width (x) you choose, the area (y) is going to be a multiple of 30 (the fixed length) because with two numbers being multiplied, if there is a fixed number that will always be the multiple and not the multiplier. For example, 10 multiplied by every number 1-10 is going to be a multiple of 10.
10x1=10, 10x2=20, 10x3=30, etc
So if Tom chooses any of these widths (x) 5, 10, or 15, y (the area) will be a multiple of 30.
30(5)=150
30(10)=300
30(15)=450
So as we double 5 to get 10, our outcome is doubled 150 to 300 and so forth. Hope this helps.
The first angle is 76 and the second angle is 14. You can check this by doing 14+5=19 and then multiply that by 4.
