Answer:
Consider, for example, the categorical syllogism: No geese are felines. ... Clearly, “Some birds are not felines” is the conclusion of this syllogism. The major term of the syllogism is “felines” (the predicate term of its conclusion), so “No geese are felines” (the premise in which “felines” appears) is its major premise.
Explanation:
Answer:
In this case, the Supreme Court has to rule against Niskayuna High School. The reason for this is because the high school did not respect Goode's beliefs and practices when it came to religion. According to the summary, Goode had lost a Harvard scholarship just because of practicing religion. The high school does not have the right to take anything away from the student; therefore, the Supreme Court has to force the Highschool to pay for Goode's Harvard tuition. Also the court has to take into consideration the fact that the school violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendent, because every person in this world has to have the right to practice any religion as desired.
Answer:
<h3>Wait until her account compromised</h3>
Explanation:
<h3>eventually she will mess up her credit and get cut off</h3>
Except when reaching an intersection with a green light
